SDLT on Divorce Settlement 2026

Court-ordered transfers between spouses or civil partners on divorce: exempt under paragraph 3 of Schedule 3 FA 2003. Private agreements without a court order do NOT benefit. Cohabitees never benefit. Get a consent order.

The court-order exemption

Under paragraph 3 of Schedule 3 to the Finance Act 2003, transfers of property between spouses or civil partners made in compliance with a court order in matrimonial or civil partnership proceedings are exempt from SDLT. The exemption is specifically for transfers under section 24 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (financial provision orders on divorce, nullity, judicial separation), corresponding provisions under the Civil Partnership Act 2004, and equivalent Scottish and Northern Irish legislation.

The exemption applies regardless of the value of the property and regardless of whether the transfer involves an assumed mortgage. So a court order requiring one spouse to transfer their interest in a £2 million matrimonial home (with a £500,000 mortgage being assumed by the receiving spouse) to the other spouse generates no SDLT, even though normally an assumed mortgage of £500,000 would attract SDLT of £15,000-£40,000 depending on the receiving spouse's other property holdings.

The exemption is on the receiving spouse's side - they pay no SDLT on the transfer in. There are no equivalent direct tax consequences for the transferring spouse from the SDLT angle (though CGT is suspended for transfers between spouses under section 58 TCGA 1992 within the tax year of permanent separation, providing a window for tax-free transfers).

Why a consent order matters

Many divorcing couples reach a financial settlement by negotiation, often with help from mediators or solicitors. The agreement is then either embodied in a consent order approved by the court, or simply executed informally without a court order. The SDLT consequences of the two paths are very different.

Consent order path: the agreement is presented to the court for approval, the court reviews it for fairness, and issues a consent order embodying the terms. Property transfers made under the consent order benefit from the paragraph 3 exemption because they are transfers in compliance with a court order. No SDLT regardless of value or assumed mortgage.

Private separation agreement path: the agreement is signed by both parties but not embodied in a court order. Property transfers made under the agreement do NOT benefit from the paragraph 3 exemption. Whether SDLT applies depends on whether chargeable consideration moves between the parties under the normal rules. If one party transfers their interest in the matrimonial home for nominal consideration and the other party assumes a £200,000 share of the mortgage, the assumed mortgage is chargeable consideration of £200,000, generating SDLT of £1,500 (standard rates) or £11,500 if the additional-dwellings surcharge applies. The cost of obtaining a consent order is typically £600-£2,000 in legal fees, often much less than the SDLT saved.

Worked examples

The consent order pathway saves SDLT in every scenario involving assumed mortgage or cash consideration. The £600-£2,000 cost of obtaining the consent order is almost always recovered many times over by the SDLT saving.

Post-divorce purchases by either ex-spouse

After a divorce settlement, the ex-spouses typically have different ongoing property positions. The spouse who retained the matrimonial home now owns it solely; any subsequent purchase by them of another residential property triggers the additional-dwellings surcharge under Schedule 4ZA FA 2003 unless they sell the retained home first or unless the purchase qualifies for replacement-of-main-residence relief.

The spouse who transferred out their interest in the matrimonial home now owns no UK property (assuming they had no others). Their subsequent purchase of a new home is treated as a standard residential purchase with no additional-dwellings surcharge - provided they are buying a main residence and do not own any other dwellings worth £40k+ at the end of the day of purchase. FTB relief is unavailable because they previously held a residential interest in the former matrimonial home.

The 3-year replacement-of-main-residence rule in paragraph 3 of Schedule 4ZA can save the retaining ex-spouse from the surcharge if they buy a new main residence and sell the former matrimonial home within 3 years. The mechanics are similar to other replacement scenarios, with the surcharge paid upfront and reclaimed via a refund claim once the original property sells.

Civil partnerships and dissolution

Civil partners on dissolution have the same SDLT exemption as spouses on divorce. The Civil Partnership Act 2004 provides for financial settlement orders equivalent to Matrimonial Causes Act orders, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 3 FA 2003 specifically extends the SDLT exemption to civil partnership orders. The mechanics are identical.

Same-sex marriages contracted in England and Wales since 13 March 2014 (and earlier in some jurisdictions) are treated identically to opposite-sex marriages for SDLT purposes. Same-sex civil partnerships continue to be available alongside marriage. All these family structures benefit from the exemption on dissolution-related property transfers.

Unmarried cohabitees and the no-exemption trap

The exemption in paragraph 3 of Schedule 3 FA 2003 applies only to married couples and civil partners. Unmarried cohabiting couples (regardless of length of cohabitation or shared children) do not benefit. Property transfers between separating cohabitees fall under the normal SDLT rules: nil where there is no chargeable consideration, taxable where the receiving party assumes a mortgage or pays cash.

This is one of the substantive tax disadvantages of cohabitation versus marriage, alongside the absence of CGT inter-spousal transfers under section 58 TCGA 1992 and the absence of the IHT inter-spouse exemption. Separating cohabitees who are transferring property between themselves should structure the arrangement carefully: if one party can take title outright with no consideration moving back, no SDLT. If consideration is unavoidable (assumed mortgage, cash, or release of other shared assets), SDLT applies on the chargeable amount.

The Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 application route allows cohabitees to obtain a court order for child-related financial provision including property transfers, but the SDLT exemption in paragraph 3 of Schedule 3 FA 2003 does not extend to Schedule 1 orders. HMRC's position is that the exemption is strictly limited to spousal and civil-partner orders.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related guides